Diálogo Ciudadano's electoral coverage rests on three operating rules that we do not negotiate.
First rule — data before narrative. Each piece must have at least one figure verifiable against a public source with a cut-off date. Polls with named firms registered with the country's electoral authority. Data from the registrar, the national electoral council, or the observer mission. Campaign-spend figures documented in the platforms' Ad Library. We do not publish poll analysis without naming the firm. We do not publish disinformation figures without a source that tracked them with open methodology.
Second rule — we do not predict outcomes. Diálogo Ciudadano reads polls as statistical snapshots with explicit margin of error, not as forecasts. When a piece describes a first place as "secured" or a second as "contested," it does so with each firm's ranges and margins, not with a proprietary aggregate projection. If the data suggests a competitive scenario, that is what we say. We do not complete stories with conclusions the data does not support.
Third rule — the angle is the intersection. Diálogo Ciudadano is not a pure-politics outlet. It is a politics, technology and digital regulation outlet. Electoral coverage prioritizes what moves in the digital layer — TikTok campaigns, paid spend on Meta, generative-AI disinformation, platform digital shields, electoral regulation applied to online space. We cover the rally at the plaza if it delivers a data point unavailable elsewhere. We do not cover it simply because the plaza is full.
The next piece in this series will examine the results of the Colombian first round on May 31 and compare what the five polling firms anticipated with what actually happened. If the difference is significant, the piece will explain why. If the difference is modest, it will examine the performance of the institutional apparatus against the 150 disinformation campaigns the Electoral Observation Mission tracked.